Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?

Subject: Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-15 12:15:19

Giacomo Drago wrote:
> OK, it is time for me to decide whether to submit this or not.

Tell us how it works!

(If you don't want to tell us how it works, then no, this is
not suitable for Boost.)

Regards,  Phil.