Subject: Re: [boost] [boost.ublas] [gsoc'15]
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-18 09:50:20
> overhead that error-codes have), but I think it's an acceptable trade-off
> here, as it's the only way to support disabling exceptions.
> What say you?
âapart from the fact it requires implementing a wrapper, which is not a big
deal, it looks like a good solution.
âWe loose the functional aspect because of passing the error code variable
by reference, but we're not supposed to be that "functional" on error codes
Sounds good to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk