Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-19 04:09:49

Next message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?"
Previous message: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
In reply to: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
Next in thread: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
Reply: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"

[Fletcher, John P]
> as I read it, the question is not the whole of <functional> but some part of it.

Correct - the subset that was deprecated in C++11. Specifically: unary_function/binary_function, ptr_fun(), mem_fun()/mem_fun_ref(), bind1st()/bind2nd(), and their associated classes.

Thanks,
STL

Next message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?"
Previous message: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
In reply to: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
Next in thread: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"
Reply: Fletcher, John P: "Re: [boost] Removing auto_ptr/etc. from Boost"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk