Subject: Re: [boost] [rational] has no maintainers
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-23 18:36:32
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Ahmed Charles <acharles_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:51 PM, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Currently, nobody has write access to Boost.Rational, and I see a number
> >> of open pull requests (mostly by John Maddock) lingering. John, would
> >> you like write access to it so that you can apply your suggested
> > Could do, but I'm maxed out right now: some of those changes are
> uncontroversial, but the last ones(s) may break existing code (even though
> they're rather sensible) and so may need some more thought.
> > While we're at it - Boost.Random has a number of outstanding pull
> requests and issues that aren't getting attending to - and folks have been
> asking about it (much more than rational). Any takers?
> Did anything ever come of this? Perhaps they could be added to the CMT?
> Steven Watanabe has been responding (intermittently) to Boost.Random bug
If no one is maintaining these libraries, the CMT is the place for them to
P.S. People are invited to contribute to the community maintenance team. I
am attempting to clear the current bottleneck (which is me!)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk