Subject: Re: [boost] MPL and MPL core
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-31 19:26:43
Peter Dimov-2 wrote
> Bruno Dutra wrote:
>> Oh well, I guess you convinced me to at least postpone it. I'll branch
>> from what I've got so far and strip every C++03 out of it.
> I feel obliged to encourage you to not do that. People may maintain that
> C++03 compatibility doesn't matter, but it still does, to a surprising
> extent. There is considerable value in MPL2 being a drop-in replacement
> MPL1. One might even argue that this is the whole point of it.
But don't we already have MPL1 for that? If one has to make MPL2
more complex to support MPL1 - wouldn't that defeat the whole
point of the project?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/MPL-and-MPL-core-tp4673889p4673987.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk