Subject: Re: [boost] MPL and MPL core
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-31 22:43:25
Eric Niebler wrote:
On 3/31/2015 4:26 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> > But don't we already have MPL1 for that? If one has to make MPL2
> > more complex to support MPL1 - wouldn't that defeat the whole
> > point of the project?
> Which is exactly why I don't see the point in writing an MPL clone.
There isn't much point in writing a C++11 MPL clone, because the idiomatic
way to do metaprogramming in C++11 is different.
This is why I'm saying that C++03 support is significant for MPL2.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk