Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] MPL and MPL core
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-31 22:43:25

Eric Niebler wrote:
On 3/31/2015 4:26 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> > But don't we already have MPL1 for that? If one has to make MPL2
> > more complex to support MPL1 - wouldn't that defeat the whole
> > point of the project?
> Which is exactly why I don't see the point in writing an MPL clone.

There isn't much point in writing a C++11 MPL clone, because the idiomatic
way to do metaprogramming in C++11 is different.

This is why I'm saying that C++03 support is significant for MPL2.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at