Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [peer review queue tardiness] Cleaning out the Boost review queue
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-02 10:56:17

On April 2, 2015 8:49:28 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> One of the things I was going to recommend at Robert's Boost 2.0 talk
> at C++ Now was that if a Boost ready library does not see a review
> after three years, and during that time it has remained maintained to
> the same quality as a Boost library, it should enter Boost
> regardless. Whilst peer review is important, it is impractical for
> very niche libraries, and where the quality of implementation,
> documentation, testing, maintainance and the maintainer are all up to
> Boost standards repeatedly demonstrated over a three year period then
> peer review is in my opinion dispensible.

We determine that a library is up to Boost standard through the peer review process.


(Sent from my portable computation engine)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at