Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.58.0] Release candidates available
From: Jessica Hamilton (jessica.l.hamilton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-06 16:19:21

On 7/04/2015 4:39 AM, "Stephan T. Lavavej" <stl_at_[hidden]>
> [Rene Rivera]
> > If you search back through email history you'd find that it used to be
> > default. But was changed as doing complete was: rarely what end users
> > wanted, used up gobs of disk space, and made the build take a really
> > time (there might be other reasons but I don't remember ATM).
> On my 3-year-old dev box with a spinny hard drive, extracting Boost
1.57.0 takes 4 minutes, and a complete x86 build plus cleanup takes 10
minutes, resulting in 2.03 GB of headers and DLLs/LIBs. Neither seems
especially onerous, aside from the fact that the Getting Started
documentation doesn't say to use a parallel build, which is *really* bad.

That's different to running regression tests. Regression tests that I've
run take somewhere around 4 hours ;-) And that's with a parallel build.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at