Subject: Re: [boost] [1.58.0] Release candidates available
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-07 04:00:57
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Stephan T. Lavavej
> <stl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> [Rene Rivera]
>>> If you search back through email history you'd find that it used to be the
>>> default. But was changed as doing complete was: rarely what end users
>>> wanted, used up gobs of disk space, and made the build take a really long
>>> time (there might be other reasons but I don't remember ATM).
>> On my 3-year-old dev box with a spinny hard drive, extracting Boost 1.57.0 takes 4 minutes, and a complete x86 build plus cleanup takes 10 minutes, resulting in 2.03 GB of headers and DLLs/LIBs. Neither seems especially onerous, aside from the fact that the Getting Started documentation doesn't say to use a parallel build, which is *really* bad.
> Could b2 default to -jX where X is the number of cores?
This would be unexpected and detrimental if there is not enough RAM.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk