Subject: Re: [boost] [WG21 mailing] N4453 Resumable expressions
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-15 15:40:28
On April 15, 2015 9:27:40 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm finding Chris' paper on resumable expressions instead of compiler
> magic created resumable functions awfully compelling:
> I essentially proposed the same with my functionally composed
> constexpr basic_future design some months ago.
> Would anyone else like to comment on this library based instead of
> compiler based resumable execution?
This is off-topic for this list.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk