Subject: Re: [boost] [typeof][CMT] Could the maintenance team please review and merge a trivial pull request?
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-22 16:25:01
John Maddock wrote:
>>> I took a look at it, and I agree, it's a simple change.
>>> However, the CMT takes care of libraries that don't have a maintainer.
>>> Boost.TypeOf is not one of those - but maybe it should be at this
>> Indeed it may be the case. Currently there are no procedures at
>> Boost to handle such situation. Maybe there should? As a starting
>> point we should probably define when a library doesn't have a
>> maintainer and think about a procedure of notifying the original
>> maintainer/author and eventually passing the rights to someone else
>> or the CMT.
>> Anyway, this change is very simple, similar to the one recently made
>> in Function
>> I also saw that the other PR
>> (https://github.com/boostorg/typeof/pull/2) was merged. Would it be
>> possible to make an exception also in this case?
> For trivial changes then IMO the CMT should be able to step in if the
> maintainer is AWOL for whatever reason (holidays, work commitments
> etc). It would be a nicety to drop them an email first, and if
> there's no reply in a reasonable time - say a week or two? - then to
> go ahead with simple fixes like this.
Another 12 days passed without the response from the maintainer. Could
the CMT please reconsider merging the pull request?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk