Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Configuring for C++14 and later library features.
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-24 13:41:20

> I suggest to do what has always been done so far (craft tests, detect
> stdlib, set macros explicitly). Is there a reason that I'm missing as
> for which the traditional approach doesn't fit here?

Clang/libc++ appears to have no other reliable mechanism, but it would
be nice to be proved wrong.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at