Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Configuring for C++14 and later library features.
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-24 13:41:20
> I suggest to do what has always been done so far (craft tests, detect
> stdlib, set macros explicitly). Is there a reason that I'm missing as
> for which the traditional approach doesn't fit here?
Clang/libc++ appears to have no other reliable mechanism, but it would
be nice to be proved wrong.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk