Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Configuring for C++14 and later library features.
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-24 14:50:40
John Maddock wrote:
> Further, if we
> get requests for more such feature-detection macros, we would end up
> including the whole std lib (see
Heh, almost exactly a year ago:
> Boost.Config does record some library features, and may have to include
> many headers in order to access the macros, which might be undesirable.
> This doesn't look acceptable to me, but what to do?
Bring it up on isocpp.features.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk