Subject: Re: [boost] Arguing about names in Boost libraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-06 19:07:48
On 6 May 2015 at 23:31, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> > It's time for somebody to say this, so I will do it. A C++ identifier
> > name, as long as it is vaguely about what the functionality entails,
> > is perfectly adequate. It does not have to satisfy everyone in the
> > universe. Period !
> I'm really surprised to read such a post on this forum.
Especially as it came from 2011
My email reader does this too sometimes, it magically resurrects an
email deleted many years ago. I find it quirky, if slightly worrying
that there must be a bug in there. At least deleting email with this
old DOS era email program is many thousand times more likely to
actually delete email compared to deleting email on gmail.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk