Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-13 14:36:14
On 13/05/15 02:10 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> If Boost decides on a future build system solution, we can do better
> than that.
Right. But again, much as you said earlier, this needs to be a help to
boost library authors, not liability. In other words, boost library
authors should have the freedom to pick the tools of their choice to
develop (including build and package) their respective libraries.
And thus, in that new world, "if boost decides" wouldn't be valid,
because each boot library project has to decide for itself.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk