Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 17:32:26
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Niall Douglas wrote:
>> On 13 May 2015 at 14:19, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>> >> Likewise, documenting the prerequisites is easy, if you have to do it
>>> >> upfront. It's only hard if these dependencies are implied, and only
>>> >> after the fact you need to re-discover them.
>>> > git submodules.
>>> That's only useful if you still want to work with the whole boost source
>>> tree as a whole, so I see it as a transitional measure.
>> Eh? Each git submodule is a direct dependency. Any git submodules
>> inside those is their direct dependencies.
> Enjoy handling cycles :)
Start here when you feel ready:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk