Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 17:32:26

Stephen Kelly wrote:

> Niall Douglas wrote:
> 
>> On 13 May 2015 at 14:19, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> 
>>> >> Likewise, documenting the prerequisites is easy, if you have to do it
>>> >> upfront. It's only hard if these dependencies are implied, and only
>>> >> after the fact you need to re-discover them.
>>> > git submodules.
>>> 
>>> That's only useful if you still want to work with the whole boost source
>>> tree as a whole, so I see it as a transitional measure.
>> 
>> Eh? Each git submodule is a direct dependency. Any git submodules
>> inside those is their direct dependencies.
> 
> Haha!
> 
> Enjoy handling cycles :)

Start here when you feel ready:

 http://search.gmane.org/search.php?group=gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel&query=incidental+modules

Thanks,

Steve.