Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 17:41:08
Tom Kent wrote:
> As and end user, I'd love to have a modular install, where just the
> libraries I need and their dependencies are installed. However, the more I
> think about it, it doesn't seem like that would be simple...
This is, if I might say so myself, a solved problem. tools/bpm does it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk