Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:25:28
On 05/14/2015 05:00 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> But I still claim that if a maintainer is maintaining their library
> to the ideal level, full STL11 usage is something they have done, are
> doing, or are planning to do soon, or alternatively are making a C++
> 11/14 total rewrite of their library. As a corollary, those
> maintainers not fully embracing STL11 usage are not maintaining their
> libraries as well as they should.
As a library maintainer, I have no intention of
doing anything of the kind. I do use C++11 in
some places, but it's controlled by #ifdefs.
I don't plan to remove the C++03 branches for
a few more years at least. There are some
places where C++14 will allow me to make the
code significantly better, but I'm certainly
not about to go out of my way to use new
language features just for the heck of it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk