Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Brian Ravnsgaard Riis (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-18 01:13:06
Den 16-05-2015 kl. 23:26 skrev Stefan Seefeld:
> I think the entire question becomes moot if individual libraries start
> following their own release schedule. Being maintained then means having
> regular releases (and thus over time it becomes obvious whether a library
> is maintained or not).
This might suggest that an old library gets removed from the boost
release, even though it may be a small piece that Just Works. I believe
that was one of Rob's bullets as well.
Or did I misunderstand you?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk