Subject: Re: [boost] Environment Variables Library?
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-20 04:42:45
On May 19, 2015 5:51:14 AM EDT, Michael Ainsworth <michael_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It'd be nice for an alternative that provides a cleaner implementation
> with less "global namespace pollution", but regardless, it appears
> that in the current situation:
> 1. Windows does not use environmental variables as much as POSIX, but
> still does use them.
> 2. There is not great support for environmental variables in the
> curren C++ standard.
> 3. Therefore, there is a need for such a library.
In my experience, non-developer tools on Windows only use PATH and, perhaps, a few system e-vars like SystemRoot.
Any tools, including scripts, I've written that use the environment have done nothing more than the equivalent of getenv() and setenv().
In the end, I don't see value in the library you suggest, but there may well be enough others who do to justify it.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk