Re: [boost] [type_traits] A bug in has_nothrow_default_constructor

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] A bug in has_nothrow_default_constructor
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-20 13:00:51

On 20/05/2015 08:39, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have submitted a new ticket: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/11324
>
> Given the information floating around that Boost.TypeTraits are
> unmaintained and that they are to be replaced with the rewrite, is there
> any chance that this is fixed, or at least the test case added to
> regression matrix?
They're not unmaintained.  However, because of the risk of changes 
breaking a lot of stuff, we do try to keep the code ultra-stable. 
"Version2" is perhaps misnamed, as it's a more of a radical face-lift 
than a replacement.  Basically remove all the no-longer needed 
workarounds and simplify as much as possible.
> BTW, does type_traits v2 handle this case correctly?
There should be no difference in behaviour between the two versions.

BTW your test case works fine for me with MSVC and GCC, so I assume this 
is an Oracle compiler issue?

John.