Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-20 18:43:47
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>> So, as I'm trying to get back into Boost.Python, I'm considering
>>> decoupling that from the rest of Boost. I think this is an obvious first
>>> candidate, notably because it's a substantial library (not header-only)
>>> that few other Boost components depend on.
> I very strongly believe that modularizing Boost will be beneficial for
> everyone. I'm offering to do the first (experimental) steps with
> Boost.Python in the hopes that this demonstrates the usefulness to other
> library authors and maintainers who will then follow the same path.
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. When you say "decoupling",
what do you mean? Moving to a separate release schedule, or making
Boost.Python not depend on other Boost libraries? What is your plan?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk