Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Do we can a non backward compatible version with non-blocking futures?
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-23 09:14:46
On 05/21/2015 11:08 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> No. In the non-blocking futures async return also a non-blocking future.
> I could change this if we think it is better to preserve async behavior.
It is probably better to have both then() and async() behave in the
Anyways, I have no objections to the changes you are proposing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk