Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Big changes in develop
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-28 08:21:16
> Do we have to use Typeof in common_type at all? In the cases in which
> common_type<T, U>::type is either T or U, can we not find that out by
> using two overloads? Is this not good enough?
Wouldn't that fail where promotions are involved for example with enum
In any case this is basically what happens when
BOOST_COMMON_TYPE_DONT_USE_TYPEOF and BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE are set.
I didn't write this one, so to be honest, I'm not sure what's lost in
that situation - type registration, better support for older MSVC?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk