Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Big changes in develop
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-28 17:14:47

> I sketched an implementation along those lines, ...

It's at

Take a look and let's see how to proceed from there. I haven't yet done the
member pointers, which I suspect nobody uses (they aren't covered by the
existing tests), but I'll add them later for completeness.

I've applied decay<> up front for simplicity, instead of faithfully doing
the reference-preserving work and then throwing that away, which makes a
difference in some corner cases, but I doubt that anybody will be able to
tell the difference. (Needless to say, those corner cases aren't being
tested at the moment.) :-)

Incidentally, why is our decay<> not the same as std::decay? Should it be
changed to conform?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at