Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [bind] Placeholders suggestion, std and boost
From: Fletcher, John P (j.p.fletcher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-29 16:20:43


When the placeholders were moved there was also a change in the way they are defined in bind/placeholders.hpp There were three different definitions which were decided using various compiler definitions. That has now been simplified to two versions, based only on #if defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR) // one option (non C++11) #else //another option #endif This action is breaking some code, in particular bind_interoperation_test on boost phoenix develop for non-C++11 test cases Initial tests show that replacing the one non C++11 with the previous three cases restores the test. Would you please look at this? Thanks John Fletcher ________________________________________ From: Boost [boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] on behalf of Peter Dimov [lists_at_[hidden]] Sent: 26 May 2015 23:32 To: boost_at_[hidden] Subject: Re: [boost] [bind] Placeholders suggestion, std and boost Glen Fernandes wrote: > I propose creating <boost/bind/bind.hpp>. Including it should result in > the placeholders being in boost::placeholders namespace. > <boost/bind.hpp> would now do nothing more than just include > <boost/bind/bind.hpp> and bring all the placeholders into the global > namespace. Done on develop (with a using directive.) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk