Re: [boost] [metaparse] performance comparisons?

Subject: Re: [boost] [metaparse] performance comparisons?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-02 08:59:43

Louis Dionne wrote:
> > I assume that you mean for 'f' to be constexpr?
>
> No, it does not change a thing. It was on purpose that I did _not_ make it 
> constexpr, in order not to mix concerns. What we're interested in is the 
> constexpr-ness of `s` within the body of `f`, whether `f` is constexpr or 
> not does not change anything.

I know that it doesn't, but we're demonstrating that 's' isn't constexpr 
even when 'f' is, which is a stronger claim than that 's' isn't constexpr 
when 'f' isn't. :-)