Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Container and tests: why is Boost.Test bypassed
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-02 16:10:21

Niall Douglas wrote:

> I am personally opposed to lightweight test because it does not integrate
> well with test results aggregation tooling, and therefore should not be
> used in new code.

What would it take for lightweight_test to be changed to integrate well?

I did read your "more explanation" but it didn't answer this question.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at