Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Container and tests: why is Boost.Test bypassed
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-02 16:10:21
Niall Douglas wrote:
> I am personally opposed to lightweight test because it does not integrate
> well with test results aggregation tooling, and therefore should not be
> used in new code.
What would it take for lightweight_test to be changed to integrate well?
I did read your "more explanation" but it didn't answer this question.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk