Re: [boost] What would make tool authors happier..

Subject: Re: [boost] What would make tool authors happier..
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-02 17:05:03

Rene Rivera wrote:
> The set of libraries that have extraneous files/dirs are roughly:
> algorithm, align, asio, assert, bind, chrono, compatibility, compute, 
> concept_check, config, container, context, conversion, convert, core, crc, 
> date_time, disjoint_sets, dynamic_bitset, endian, filesystem, format, 
> functional, fusion, geometry, gil, heap, interprocess, intrusive, 
> lexical_cast, locale, log, math, move, mpl, multi_index, multiprecision, 
> numeric, phoenix, polygon, predef (yes my own lib, I know), property_tree, 
> proto, python, random, random, regex, serialization, smart_ptr, sort, 
> spirit, statechart, static_assert, test, thread, tokenizer, type_index, 
> type_traits, typeof, units, unordered, utility, uuid, variant, wave, and 
> xpressive.

I don't consider extraneous files/dirs within library directories a problem 
as they neither confuse tools nor interfere with modularization.