Re: [boost] [metaparse] Review period starts May 25th and ends June 7th - ongoing

Subject: Re: [boost] [metaparse] Review period starts May 25th and ends June 7th - ongoing
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-03 18:27:08

Abel Sinkovics <abel <at> elte.hu> writes:

> 
> Hi Louis,
> 
> On 2015-06-03 23:42, Louis Dionne wrote:
> > Louis Dionne <ldionne.2 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > [...]
>
> The "getting_started" example consists of headers that are milestones 
> for the tutorial. For example to get all the definitions before section 
> 5.2.1, you should include "5_2_1.hpp". This is mentioned at the 
> beginning ("1.1 Testing environment") of the tutorial. Is that what you 
> meant?

Yes, this is what I meant. My bad. However, I still think it is not a 
really user-friendly way of making that code available. I'd prefer a 
more "standard" style of tutorial, where you can just copy/paste code
from the webpage as you go, and into a source file not Metashell. 
However, this is a non technical point and I'd rather not lose time
over it since I'm satisfied with the overall tutorial.

> [...]
>
> If you have some reusable environment, I'd be glad to use it (I've done 
> the measurements with ad-hoc scripts).

Well, I use ad-hoc scripts too, but they are pretty cool because everything
can be controlled from CMake and they generate Javascripts charts that can
be embedded in the HTML documentation :-). Also, my benchmarks are run on 
Travis and pushed to a special branch on GitHub whenever I push to master, 
which is handy for keeping them up to date. I'll try to send you a pull 
request setting up the basic system, but that might have to wait until the 
end of my own review. Also, what will happen with the CMake-based build 
system in the new Metaparse repository?

Regards,
Louis