|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [metaparse] performance comparisons?
From: Abel Sinkovics (abel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-07 14:51:50
Hi Evgeny,
On 2015-06-07 11:41, Evgeny Panasyuk wrote:
>
>> Thus, while I assume that it is faster than what happens inside the
>> MPLLIBS_STRING (haven't measured it), its use is more limited, too.
>
> As I understand, complexity of MPLLIBS_STRING comes from fact that it
> can be passed immediately as template argument.
>
Exactly. The point is to be able to write:
some_template<MPLLIBS_STRING(".....")>
without having to mention the string (define it in some way) anywhere
earlier in the code.
Regards,
Ãbel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk