Subject: Re: [boost] [predef] Using predef-check on 'develop' problem
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-09 23:34:08
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jessica Hamilton <
> On 9 June 2015 at 19:40, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
> > wrote:
> >> I think I know what is wrong in the predef-check functionality. In my
> >> jamfile the use of predef-check, for any given compile or run rule,
> >> like:
> >> [ predef-check "BOOST_COMP_GNUC >= 4.3" "BOOST_OS_QNX == 0" : :
> >> <cxxflags>-std=c++0x ]
> > Yes..
> > What I am seeing is that except on QNX, where "BOOST_OS_QNX != 0", the
> >> '-std=c++0x' is always being added as a C++ compiler flag to the command
> >> line.
> >> This initially suggests to me that you are treating more than one quoted
> >> predef definition as an OR gate rather than an AND gate. But note that
> >> QNX, where where "BOOST_OS_QNX != 0" and "BOOST_COMP_GNUC >= 4.3" is
> >> the '-std=c++0x' is not being added. So your logic seems to be that as
> >> go through multiple predef definitions once you hit a 'true' condition
> >> choose the 'true' path as long as no 'false' conditions follow it, else
> >> choose the 'false' path.
> >> Please see if you can fix this given this clue about how predef-check is
> >> working for the VMD regression tests on various platforms/compilers.
> > I don't know if it helped but I did a change to one of the tests I do to
> > completely cover all the Venn variations of the binary and expression. I
> > changed my test to this:
> > [ run check_value.cpp : : : <test-info>always_show_run_output
> > [ predef-check "BOOST_COMP_CLANG > 0" "BOOST_OS_LINUX == 0" : :
> > <cxxflags>-DCHECK_VALUE=true : <cxxflags>-DCHECK_VALUE=false ] ]
> Out of curiosity, what happens if you remove the second <cxxflags>
> variable, and use an #ifndef check, and run again? It's the only
> difference I can notice between the two examples.
OK.. Did that change. My local OSX test shows "CHECK_VALUE == 1" as
expected and correctly. In a few minutes I'll post what the online tests
show. But the expectation is that they should all show "CHECK_VALUE ==
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk