Re: [boost] [Better Enums] More complete release - feedbackrequested

Subject: Re: [boost] [Better Enums] More complete release - feedbackrequested
From: Anton Bachin (antonbachin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-11 11:25:07

> On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:22, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> Anton Bachin wrote:
>> I’m planning to overload the stream operators, but probably in a separate header file. The reason is that including <iostream> slows down compilation by an order of magnitude or so compared to just the current contents of enum.h, when used for a few enums. Do you think I should just not bother with this, and include it anyway?
> 
> <iosfwd> should be enough, I think.

Perfect, this is the kind of thing I was hoping for. Thanks!