Re: [boost] [config] Using SD-6 macros

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Using SD-6 macros
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-13 07:10:53

On June 13, 2015 2:30:51 AM EDT, Stephen Kelly <hello_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
> > Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> >> The reason for this is literally that the chair of SG-10 didn't
> want to
> >> require the stdlib implementor to have to open another file in
> their
> >> editor to add the macro there.
> > 
> > It's not just the editor. You could have a configuration in which
> some
> > stdlib headers come from one place and some from another. Although
> one
> > could argue that this isn't a reason enough, and I might be inclined
> > to agree.
> 
> You would? Wow. Ok.

I suspect you didn't read Peter's statement correctly. He was saying he's inclined to agree that headers coming from multiple places is not a sufficient reason for embedding the SD-6 macro in the various standard library headers instead of in one.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)