Re: [boost] [config] Using SD-6 macros

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Using SD-6 macros
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-13 18:01:23

On 13.06.2015 17:10, Edward Diener wrote:
> On 6/13/2015 5:22 AM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> On 13.06.2015 05:26, Edward Diener wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2015 1:05 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All __cpp_lib macros have an associated header, although I don't
>>>> know if
>>>> we currently have Boost.Config equivalents for any of them.
>>>
>>> I can see them but they are all C++14 features. Are we really objecting
>>> to including a particular standard library header in order to test for
>>> the existence of the equivalent SD-6 macro ?
>>
>> Yes, that would be the objection from my side, at least. I don't want to
>> include a whole std header to check for a single feature that may be
>> implemented in it. And I want Boost.Config to include most of STL even
>> less.
>
> And the rationale for this is what ? Compile-time computer cycles ?

Yes.