Re: [boost] [hana] some notes, not a review

Subject: Re: [boost] [hana] some notes, not a review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-19 07:17:06

On 6/19/15 1:40 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> What template meta-programming were you able to replace by constexpr?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, I've yet to see a use case where constexpr is
> anything but an optimization hint.

Hmmm - what about all the mpl arithmetic functions built around mpl 
integral constants?  All that gets replace by easy to understand compile 
time expressions which can be used in other template expressions?  This 
simplifies things immensely.

Robert Ramey