Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-21 08:04:52

Next message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [release] policy not to add C++14 libraries"
Previous message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [release] policy not to add C++14 libraries"
In reply to: Bjorn Reese: "Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?"

2015-06-21 13:34 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Reese <breese_at_[hidden]>:

AFAIK, the integration with Boost.Asio is limited to a single header
> (<boost/asio/spawn.hpp>) which you only include if you want to use
> coroutines. This header is one of those "bridge headers" which does
> not really belong to either library.
>

I would suggest to use execution_context directly instead of coroutine<>

Next message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [release] policy not to add C++14 libraries"
Previous message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [release] policy not to add C++14 libraries"
In reply to: Bjorn Reese: "Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk