Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: QVM (generic Quaternion, Vector and Matrix operations library)
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-26 22:54:10
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Michael Marcin <mike.marcin_at_[hidden]>
> On 6/26/2015 3:42 AM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> 1) Character constants containing more than one character are
>> implementation-defined (not portable).
>> 2) The swizzling dispatch must be done at compile-time. You couldn't do
>> this with an int argument to operator.
>> 3) operator must be a member function, and QVM operations work on
>> user-defined types. You can, of course, define operator in your own
>> in terms of operator% from QVM.
>> So we're stuck with:
>> v%X *= 42;
>> v%YXZ *= 42;
> I'm not a TMP wizard and I haven't looked at your implementation but what
> about something like.
This seems better than %, thanks. I need to think carefully if the ,
overload could somehow interfere with things like passing vectors to other
-- Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk