Re: [boost] Boost.Experimental Re: [variant] Maintainer

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Experimental Re: [variant] Maintainer
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-02 11:39:11

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 7/2/15 7:44 AM, Gottlob Frege wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé
>> <kaballo86_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>
>  Perhaps you'd wish to bring back the Sandbox
>>> (http://www.boost.org/community/sandbox.html), which has been
>>> superseded by
>>> standalone repositories since the move to Git.
>>>
>>
>  I think we need *something* for experimental libraries.  Even if it is
>> just someone's own git repository stamped (but not endorsed) with the
>> Boost "brand".
>> Or a page in boost.org listing current experiments.
>> Or... something.
>>
>
>  I'd like some kind of experimental area that would help find the best
>> possible libraries.
>>
>
> Why isn't the boost library incubator considered ideal here?  In
> combination with github it already provides everything necessary - and
> significantly more already.  And it's ridiculously easy to use.

I second that sentiment. (i.e. +1)

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail