Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-07 13:42:47

2015-07-07 1:25 GMT+03:00 Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>:

> El 06/07/2015 a las 22:48, Antony Polukhin escribió:
>
>> Your request is not the first, so probably such feature is highly required
>> by library users. Is it OK to leave dependencies to Boost.Predef,
>> string_ref and Boost.WinAPI?
>>
>
> That would be great. Why string_ref and not const char *, symbols are not
> null-terminated?

I like string_ref because it allows to provide single overload for
std::string and const char* parameters. Probably you're right and `const
char*` is sufficient.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin