Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-announce] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Richard (legalize_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-16 12:06:19
In article <55969319.8040900_at_[hidden]>,
Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]> writes:
> - Should the library be accepted?
Looks good to me.
> - How useful is it?
It's useful to have a single way of dealing with shared libraries
across platforms. I've done it a number of times myself and this
library would have made things easier.
> - What's your evaluation of
> - Design
> - Implementation
I didn't inspect the implementation.
> - Documentations
The documentation is fine. There are a few minor grammar/typos but I
didn't take note of their specific location, sorry.
> - Tests
I didn't look at the tests.
> - How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
I read through the Motivation, Getting Started and Tutorial. I
skimmed the reference. I read the FAQ, Design Rationale and
> - Did you attempt to use the library? On what systems and compilers?
I didn't attempt to use it.
-- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk