Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-09 11:38:56
2015-08-07 15:41 GMT-03:00 VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira <
> 2015-08-07 15:24 GMT-03:00 Glen Fernandes <glen.fernandes_at_[hidden]>:
>> Do you have any preliminary
>> benchmarks that you could share during the review period?
>> Perhaps to:
>> - cpp-netlib
>> - poco
>> - casablanca
>> - proxygen
> I could provide a sloopy benchmark (just static hello world) during this
Application: get the host header, get the request uri, concatenate both and
send as reply.
Tested using weighttp -n 20000 -c 1000 -k http://localhost:8080/
You can see that performance of Boost.Http versus Pion was roughly the
same, but Boost.Http created no extra threads. If I used one extra thread,
I think I could see a speedup. Also, notice that the pion example didn't
log any output to the standard output, while the Boost.Http is printing
everything that happens.
There is also the POCO test. I'd say the performance is promising.
-- VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk