Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-12 12:13:03
Niall Douglas wrote:
> "The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of its
> authors and those who contributed feedback, code, links and ideas.
> This article does not reflect the official policy nor position of
> Boost, nor necessarily any one Boost library author, library
> maintainer, or community member."
It's getting better. I replaced it with: "The views and opinions expressed
in this article are those of its authors. This article does not reflect the
official policy nor position of Boost, nor necessarily any Boost library
author, library maintainer, or community member."
If you wish to share responsibility for any of the views and opinions that
you've expressed in the article (with any of the people that contributed
ideas or code to you) then maybe you should add a section to the article and
credit those people by name. Otherwise, that wording does not belong in the
> Thanks for the edit. Now you're an author of the handbook too.
You're welcome. I'm happy for the article to note that I contributed the
disclaimer that tells people that you don't speak for Boost or its
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/http-Formal-review-of-Boost-Http-tp4678604p4678782.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk