Re: [boost] [http] Formal Review

Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal Review
From: Lee Clagett (forum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-14 01:58:30

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Lee Clagett <forum_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira <
> vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> 2015-08-13 22:19 GMT-03:00 Lee Clagett <forum_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> Fair enough. I didn't document this behaviour. I'll gather all these
>> points
>> after the review period to implement these improvements.
>>
>
>> About the embedded device situation, it'll be improved when I expose the
>> parser options, then you'll be able to set max headers size, max header
>> name size, mas header value size and so on. With all upper limits figured
>> out, you can provide a single chunk of memory for all data.
>>
>>
>>
> But what if an implementation wanted to discard some fields to really keep
> the memory low? I think that was the point of the OP. I think this is
> difficult to achieve with a notifying parser. It might be overkill for
> Boost.Http, people under this durress can seek out existing Http parsers.
>
>
*without a notfying parser