Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Boost.Http formal review is finished
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 12:55:32
> I notice that a couple of libraries submitted for formal review
> haven't submitted to the incubator. This concerns me as one of the
> motivations of the incubator was to make for information available and
> avoid a scenario whereby libraries "snuck though" the review process and
> ended up having some surprises which I was unhappy about.
Could you elaborate on your concerns?
If a library is listed on the review schedule, has a link to source, has a
link to documentation, and has had a mailing list thread requesting
feedback: What information is not available to reviewers?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/http-Boost-Http-formal-review-is-finished-tp4678943p4678962.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk