Subject: Re: [boost] [core] Determining interest for two new classes: readonly and newtype
From: Sam Kellett (samkellett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-18 19:04:26
On 18 August 2015 at 23:56, Glen Fernandes <glen.fernandes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Sam wrote:
> > and if so what is the process for that, i know a new library
> > should be incubated and reviewed, but is that true for extending an
> > existing library too?
> To contribute to an existing library, it is up to the maintainer of that
> library. There isn't a formal review process around it (unless the
> maintainer of that library initiates one).
thanks, a quick check at the trac lists peter as the maintainer of core
(and he's stated that he doesn't thing this is the correct place for these
classes), and no maintainer for utility.. does that mean utility is
maintained by the community maintenance team?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk