Subject: Re: [boost] This AFIO review (was: Re: [afio] AFIO review postponed till Monday)
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-23 11:16:00
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015, Niall Douglas wrote:
> I couldn't find a Table 1.4.
> Did you mean Table 1.5, the one comparing NoSQL databases with the
> naÃ¯ve iostreams and AFIO key-value store and where AFIO comes off
> looking particularly badly?
"Table 1.4. This solution will perform reasonably well under these conditions"
That "Maximum performance isn't important to you" was crossed implying
that this solution satisfied the desire for performance. Unless you
meant "is" instead of "isn't", but then the benchmarks don't reflect
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk