Subject: Re: [boost] This AFIO review
From: Ahmed Charles (acharles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 19:41:07
On 8/29/2015 11:27 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> On 8/29/2015 3:13 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Maybe we
>> should make a minor update on some page or another which advises
>> potential review managers to make a pre-check of the library to get an
>> idea as to what they are really signing up for.
> This would be "Boost Formal Review Process, Notes for Review Managers":
Other than not having the time to read every post during the week, I
believe the review is going fine (from a process perspective). I'm not
the sort to want to moderate what people say anyways. And a review being
contentious is not really something I can/should pre-check for.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk