Subject: Re: [boost] [AFIO] Review (or lack of it)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-31 10:15:37
On 30 Aug 2015 at 22:25, Gruenke,Matt wrote:
> In both cases, there should be a clear comment that explains why the
> code is disabled. While AFIO has such comments (though often quite
> terse) in some cases, there are several where it seems the reader is
> left to guess why it has been left in the code, but disabled.
> In short, there should always be a clear purpose behind leaving an #if
> 0'd block in the code. As long as that's true, it shouldn't be hard to
> state that in a brief, clear comment.
Yes, I agree. Logged to
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk