Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-04 13:28:21

On 9/4/2015 1:02 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 2015-09-04 17:49 GMT+02:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
>
> I find this decision to be quite unfortunate, given that the last time I
>> checked (although it has been a while) supporting C++11 would be fairly
>> easy. If I recall correctly, the requirement comes from the use of
>> `index_sequence` which can be easily replaced (
>> https://github.com/boostorg/fusion/blob/master/include/boost/fusion/support/detail/index_sequence.hpp),
>> and the use init-captures in lambdas which can be emulated with a little
>> code gymnastics. Oliver, could you confirm this is still the case?
>>
>> I am not objecting to this decision, which is for Oliver to make. On the
>> contrary, I would like to volunteer to help make Boost.Fiber C++11
>> compatible if accepted.
>>
>
> boost.fiber itself requires C++14 as well as boost.context on which
> boost.fiber depends
> C++11 is missing integer_sequence<> (deferred execution of callable with
> arguments/parameter packs) and support of move capture (generalized lambda
> capture) used by both libraries.

Nod, just like my analysis above says. So would you be willing to take 
patches for C++11 support?

Regards,
-- 
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com